A robust composite mean velocity profile is developed for turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) subjected to adverse pressure gradients (APGs), extending the composite formulation for generic pressure-gradient TBLs proposed by Nickels (2004 J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 521). Several modifications are introduced to capture characteristic features of these APG flows. A new parameter accounts for pressure-gradient history effects in the wake region, a velocity-overshoot function is incorporated into the inner region and the wake function is reformulated using an independent, physically motivated definition of the boundary-layer thickness. A compilation of APG TBL datasets from the literature, including the new dataset presented in Part 1, is used to assess and refine the formulation. The resulting composite profile contains three physically meaningful parameters that capture pressure-gradient effects on the mean velocity profile, determined through nonlinear curve fitting. These parameters form the basis of a framework for identifying ‘well-behaved’ APG TBLs and for characterising pressure-gradient history effects. The composite profile further enables reliable estimation of the friction velocity and boundary-layer thickness in well-behaved APG TBLs, providing a practical tool for scaling analyses when these quantities are not directly measurable. Its analytical form also yields improved estimates of mean velocity gradients, facilitating evaluation of the indicator function and identification of inflection points. Finally, the formulation provides predictive capability for both the coefficients, and spatial extent, of the logarithmically scaled region of the mean streamwise velocity profile, enabling evaluation of its universality in high-Reynolds-number APG TBLs. This reveals that the von Kármán coefficient ( kappa κ κ ) approaches an invariant value of kappa almost equals 0.39 κ ≈ 0.39 κ ≈ 0.39 at sufficiently high Reynolds numbers, independent of pressure-gradient effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zarei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: