Cemented sand and gravel (CSG) exhibits distinct shear and volumetric deformation responses. This study assesses a double-yield-surface incremental formulation and recalibrates its axial and volumetric response relations using coordinates digitized from the available triaxial plots. Three binder contents, 20, 60, and 100 kg/m3, are examined at confining pressures of 300–1200 kPa. Stress-induced yield differentials, plastic multipliers, and the coefficients used for triaxial path matching are distinguished. Mixture-specific parameters and yield-contour shape ratios are reported, and the necessary axial condition Et ≤ E is satisfied over the investigated ascending branches. The pointwise calibration root-mean-square residuals range from 31 to 131 kPa in deviatoric stress and from 0.021 to 0.179 percentage points in volumetric strain. These are in-sample fitting statistics, not independent prediction errors or estimates of specimen-to-specimen variability. Published test methods are briefly summarized, while specimen-level records and replicate variability associated with the digitized curves remain uncertain. The volumetric-hardening relation requires additional source-state information for independent reconstruction. Accordingly, the findings support an assessment of graphical calibration within the reported stress and strain ranges, rather than independent validation or completed numerical model implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: