This study examines how ground-floor urban form relates to perceived safety in Stockholm, Sweden, using approximately one million street view images collected between 2010 and 2021 together with multi-source built-environment data. Jan Gehl’s writings discuss perceived safety as part of a human-centered design framework that integrates both traffic- and crime-related safety through street-level environmental design, drawing together ideas also established in broader planning and safety scholarship. Building on Gehl’s integrative framework, we operationalize a set of design attributes emphasized in his work and evaluate their associations with perceived safety scores derived from locally collected image-comparison surveys and extended citywide using deep learning models. Across multiple modeling approaches and two spatial scales, ground-floor features related to transparency and public–private transitions show the strongest and most consistent positive associations with perceived safety, often exceeding the explanatory strength of neighborhood demographic and land-use controls. Other features such as pedestrian and cycling infrastructure also demonstrate meaningful relationships, particularly at a finer spatial scale. These findings suggest that perceived safety is closely associated with the human-scale, street-level design features integrated within Gehl’s framework and demonstrate how computational urban analytics can operationalize qualitative design principles and evaluate their relevance to urban livability at scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: