Microbial-assisted biofortification represents a sustainable strategy to improve the efficiency of selenium (Se) fertilization for producing Se-enriched tea. However, whether microbial inoculation can jointly enhance rhizosphere Se availability and plant Se acquisition remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of co‑applying selenite with the Se-reducing bacterium Erwinia sp. PSI-03 on Se accumulation in tea plants, focusing on rhizosphere microbiota restructuring and root phenotypic adaptation. Results showed that although either Se fertilization or PSI-03 inoculation alone improved plant growth, the best performance was observed under their co-application. Compared with Se fertilization alone, co-application significantly increased both total and organic Se concentrations in spring-harvested tender leaves. At final harvest, it further increased Se accumulation across all plant organs, with increases of 32.1% and 40.8% in leaf total and organic Se concentrations, respectively. This increase was linked with a 26.3% rise in soil available Se and accompanied by an increased relative abundance of Bacillota , which was positively correlated with both soil available Se and plant Se concentrations. Functional prediction (PICRUSt2) indicated higher predicted abundances of bacterial genes (e.g., cysI , cysJ , nirS , metK , GST , and selA ) involved in Se transformation and mobilization under co-application. Co-application did not enhance root-to-stem or root-to-leaf Se translocation in plants, but enhanced root Se acquisition, accompanied by increased total root length, surface area, volume, and upregulated expression of transporter genes associated with Se acquisition ( CsPHO1;2 and CsPHT4;1a ). Additionally, root anatomical responses were selective, with a significant increase in cortex cell number. Collectively, this work highlights a potential mechanism underlying microbial-assisted Se-enriched tea production, in which co-application reshapes the rhizosphere microbiota and enhances root morphological development. These findings are helpful for the development of green biofortification strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LI et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: