Slow-moving landslides do not respond uniformly to rainfall and reservoir-level fluctuations: the same hydrological trigger can produce markedly different displacement responses depending on when it occurs. Determining whether a landslide is in a dormant or an active dynamical regime may therefore provide information complementary to conventional hydrological-threshold warning systems. This study applies critical slowing down (CSD) indicators to 17 years of monthly GPS displacement data from three slow-moving reservoir landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (Baishuihe, Bazimen, Shuping), with a two-state Gaussian hidden Markov model (HMM) serving as an independent statistical validation benchmark. Three findings emerge. First, CSD cannot provide statistically significant lead-time warning ahead of individual displacement acceleration events (all 27 permutation tests p > 0.05 ). Second, CSD indicators, and Variance in particular, show consistent discrimination between dormant and active regimes across the three sites, as validated by the HMM (6/9 point-biserial correlations survive Bonferroni correction). Third, Variance significantly outperforms AR1 at Bazimen and Shuping and across the three sites in meta-analysis (Stouffer combined Z = + 5.60 , p < 0.001 ), with the two indicators statistically tied at Baishuihe, a rank order that reverses the consensus of the ecological CSD literature—a reversal that may be related to the heavy-tailed distribution of monthly landslide displacement increments. Together, these findings suggest that CSD indicators carry regime-classification information not recoverable from hydrological variables alone, and contribute a nonlinear-dynamics perspective to the emerging research strand on regime identification in landslide early warning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: