Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study assessed the perception and use of Meta-AI among undergraduate students in Sokoto, Nigeria. A structured questionnaire was administered to 140 undergraduate students to examine the benefits, platforms of access, frequency of use, and challenges associated with Meta-AI. Data were analyzed using frequency and percentage. Results revealed that students perceived multiple benefits of Meta-AI: faster learning (28.6%) was the most cited benefit, followed by communication (21.4%), productivity improvement (18.6%), content creation/writing (17.1%), and picture generation (14.3%). Regarding platforms for locating Meta-AI, Google was most dominant (42.9%), followed by WhatsApp (32.9%) and Instagram (24.3%), indicating high integration of Meta-AI in everyday apps. Frequency of use showed that 54.3% use Meta-AI daily, 31.4% sometimes, and 14.3% weekly, demonstrating strong adoption. However, challenges were identified: sometimes giving wrong information (35.7%) was the major challenge, followed by privacy concerns (21.4%), overdependence (17.1%), high cost (10.0%), bias (8.6%), and hallucination (7.1%). The study concludes that undergraduates in Sokoto have positive perception of Meta-AI as a learning and productivity tool with high daily usage, but concerns about misinformation and privacy remain critical. There is need for AI literacy training to promote critical evaluation and responsible use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gada et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: