Unmanned aerial vehicle Structure-from-Motion (UAV-SfM) products depend on acquisition and georeferencing. This study tested whether light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-constrained iterative closest point (ICP) post-registration reduces discrepancies in directly georeferenced products and improves digital surface model (DSM) agreement. Twelve configurations (three flight heights × four forward overlaps) were processed using ground control point (GCP)-constrained, directly georeferenced (noGCP), and LiDAR-ICP-registered (noGCP_ICP) strategies at a mixed-surface site; the noGCP models used onboard GNSS positions recorded as single-point (uncorrected) solutions. Reconstruction completeness, cloud-to-cloud (C2C) discrepancy, and the DSM of difference (DoD) were evaluated against the LiDAR data. Mean C2C root mean square error (RMSE) decreased from 2.934 m for noGCP models to 0.583 m after ICP, versus 0.353 m for GCP-constrained models. In the DoD, under the ±5 m sensitivity filter applied within each model’s own valid domain, mean RMSE in elevation (RMSEz) decreased from 2.988 to 1.300 m but remained above the 1.097 m of the GCP-constrained models. Improved point-cloud alignment therefore did not yield an equivalent reduction in DSM discrepancy. Because one LiDAR dataset supported both ICP estimation and evaluation, results represent LiDAR-relative rather than independent validation. LiDAR-constrained ICP is a conditional alignment strategy, not a substitute for robust georeferencing or image-network geometry. The reductions therefore quantify agreement with that reference and do not establish an independently validated improvement in absolute accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: