This open-label, prospective study was conducted to compare the impact of epoetin β vs standard care on quality of life (QoL) in anaemic patients with lymphoid or solid tumour malignancies. A total of 262 anaemic patients (haemoglobin [Hb] ⩽ 11 g dl −1 ) were randomised to a 12-week treatment with s.c. epoetin β (initial dose 150 IU kg −1 three times weekly) or standard care. Transfusions were recommended for both groups at an Hb threshold of 8.5 g dl −1 . The primary efficacy variables were improvement in QoL as measured using the Short-Form-36 physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) score and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy fatigue and anaemia subscales (FACT-F and FACT-An). A visual analogue scale (VAS) was also used as a global QoL measure. Clinical response was defined as a ⩾ 2 g dl −1 increase in Hb level without need of transfusion after the initial 4 weeks of treatment. Baseline to final visit changes in SF-36 PCS, FACT-F and VAS scores were significantly greater with epoetin β than with standard care ( P <0.05); changes in FACT-An subscale score tended to be greater with epoetin β ( P =0.076). Epoetin β significantly increased Hb concentrations relative to standard care (responders: 47% vs 13%; P <0.001). Levels of endogenous erythropoietin <50 mIU ml −1 were significantly predictive of response (OR 2.496, 95% CI: 1.21–5.13). Epoetin β therapy significantly improves QoL compared with standard care in anaemic patients with solid tumours and lymphoid malignancies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boogaerts et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: