Key result
Pentaspline PFA posterior mitral line ablation achieves durable block in only ~20% of redo patients.
Why the study?
Durability of a posterior mitral line via a pentaspline pulsed field ablation catheter is uncertain.
Does posterior mitral line ablation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter provide durable mitral isthmus block in patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias?
Cohort (n=54)
Yes
Does posterior mitral line ablation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter provide durable mitral isthmus block in patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias?
Posterior mitral line ablation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter shows low durability (20.4%) in patients requiring redo procedures for recurrent atrial arrhythmias, with most reconnections occurring at the ventricular portion of the isthmus.
Durable mitral isthmus block remains infrequent after pentaspline PFA; leaves open optimal lesion sets for perimitral flutter prevention.
Background Durability of a posterior mitral line (PML) via a pentaspline pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter is uncertain. Objective To assess mitral isthmus (MI) block durability and recurrence mechanisms after fluoroscopy-guided PML ablation using a pentaspline PFA catheter. Methods In a multicenter registry, we included consecutive patients undergoing redo procedure for recurrent atrial arrhythmia after an index procedure that included fluoroscopy-guided PML ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter. The primary endpoint was durable MI block at redo procedure. Results The study included 54 patients (age 68.8 ± 8.5 years, 29.6% female) from three European tertiary centers. Acute MI block at index procedure had been achieved in 49/54 (90.7%) after a median of 28 applications [19–48]. Redo procedures were performed after a median time of 287 days [161-489]. Durable MI block was present in only 11 patients (20.4% of the whole cohort; 22.4% of those with documented acute block). Perimitral flutter was the dominant presenting rhythm (38.9%). Reconnection involved predominantly the ventricular portion of the MI (33/43; 76.7%); epicardial breakthrough was identified in 5/43 (11.6%). Neither catheter size nor left atrial volume was independently associated with durability. Conclusion Despite a high acute success rate, durable MI block after PML ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter was the exception in patients undergoing redo procedures for recurrent atrial arrhythmia, with the ventricular portion of the MI as the principal site of reconnection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaher et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Recurrent atrial arrhythmia (n=54). Posterior mitral line ablation using a pentaspline PFA catheter was evaluated on Durable MI block at redo procedure. Durable mitral isthmus block was present in only 20.4% of patients undergoing a redo procedure for recurrent atrial arrhythmia after posterior mitral line ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: