Key result
Type 2 diabetes and diabetic foot syndrome impair endothelial function and arterial stiffness.
Why the study?
The association of endothelial function and arterial stiffness with diabetic foot syndrome in type 2 diabetes patients has not been explored yet.
Case-Control (n=480)
Impact of diabetic foot syndrome on vascular markers remains unquantified in type 2 diabetes; leaves open prospective validation of arterial stiffness.
Diabetic foot (DF) syndrome is the most common lower-extremity complication of poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) (1). DF affects the quality of life of T2D patients and is associated with increased morbidity (2). T2D-related mechanisms induce endothelial dysfunction and adverse effects on vascular biology (3). We have recently shown that measurements of endothelial function and arterial stiffness are strongly associated with diabetic retinopathy (4), but their association with DF has not been explored yet. To examine this, we enrolled 284 consecutive T2D subjects visiting our outpatient diabetes clinic and 196 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects without evidence of diabetes or cardiovascular or other disease. Subjects with known malignancy, hepatic impairment, or acute or chronic inflammatory disease were excluded from the study. Study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Endothelial function was assessed by the flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) were assessed by SphygmoCor (AtCor Medical) as …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonopoulos et al. (2015) conducted a case-control in Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Foot Syndrome (n=480). Type 2 diabetes vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation) and arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity and augmentation index). The impact of type 2 diabetes and diabetic foot syndrome on endothelial function and arterial stiffness was evaluated, but quantitative results are not provided in the truncated abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: