PURPOSE: Stricture prevention, avoiding exposed mucosa and cosmesis are important considerations when constructing continent abdominal stomas. We analyzed our results of continent abdominal stomas using the umbilicus and 2 types of lower abdominal stomas, that is the V-quadrilateral-Z technique and the tubular skin flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. All patients with a continent abdominal stoma were included in our study. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to type of stoma, including umbilicus, tubular skin flap and V-quadrilateral-Z. The groups were compared regarding demographics, etiology, success, complications and the need for revision. RESULTS: A total of 40 incontinent patients were included in our study. All underwent Mitrofanoff urinary diversion (37) and/or Malone antegrade continence enema construction (13) between 1993 and 2007. The umbilicus was used for 31 conduits, the V-quadrilateral-Z was used for 8 and the tubular skin flap was used for 11. Patient age and gender, and the etiology of incontinence were similar in the 3 groups. All patients achieved good cosmesis with a hidden bowel mucosa. In the V-quadrilateral-Z group no patient had stomal stenosis. Five patients (45%) in the tubular skin flap group required dilation or revision for obstruction or stenosis, which was successful in 4. Eight umbilical conduits (25%) had to be dilated or revised due to stomal stenosis (6) and conduit obstruction (2). CONCLUSIONS: Initial results with the V-quadrilateral-Z flap show its superiority over the tubular skin flap and the umbilicus for stomal construction in patients with a Mitrofanoff or Malone antegrade continence enema conduit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Landau et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: