A Bayesian factor-augmented interacted vector autoregression framework purified of expectations is employed to analyze how government spending shocks have impacted CO 2 emissions in the United States from the 1980s to the pre-pandemic period. Consumption-generated emissions are found to have generally risen following fiscal expansions, although their elasticity to government spending has declined substantially over time—with the five-year elasticity dropping from about 0.6 in the early 1980s to around zero by 2019. In contrast, positive government spending shocks increased production-generated emissions in the early 1980s — with a five-year elasticity near 0.5 — but reversed course by the end of the 1980s, eventually reaching an elasticity of −0.7 by the end of the sample. Examination of time-varying interaction variables suggests that environmental regulation, tertiarization, and a larger share of spending on public goods are associated with a mitigation — or even a reversal — of the emissions growth related to economic expansions driven by government spending. The income channel plays a more limited role, mostly confined to the earlier part of the sample. Furthermore, government consumption and investment are both associated with these shifts in emissions elasticities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bucchianico et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: