Onshore power supply (OPS), also termed cold ironing (CI), is central to port decarbonisation, yet shore-side infrastructure is still dimensioned by deterministic, peak-based rules that ignore the temporal dynamics of vessel traffic. This study couples a modular cold-ironing virtual model with a machine-learning Digital Shadow and validates it at the Port of Ancona using a full year of hourly vessel-traffic data (8784 hours) and 55 exogenous features spanning meteorological, temporal and vessel-traffic variables. The reconstructed load is structurally hostile to conventional planning: an annual demand of 52.2 GWh, a peak-to-average ratio of 4.42, a load factor of 22.6%, and an absolute peak of 26.3 MW reached in fewer than 5% of operating hours. Three learning paradigms are evaluated within a thirteen-model ensemble under two architectures: a static configuration using only exogenous inputs, and a nonlinear autoregressive configuration with exogenous inputs (NARX). The NARX architecture raises the best one-step coefficient of determination from 0.562 to 0.851 and reduces RMSE by 42%, and the multilayer perceptron is the most accurate model, exceeding SARIMA, LSTM and TCN baselines. An ablation attributes most of the skill to autoregressive memory (+0.289 R2) and a smaller but genuine gain to exogenous variables (+0.032). One-step accuracy degrades under fully recursive operation (24-hour R2 of 0.61), which bounds autonomous day-ahead use. Sizing infrastructure at the 95th demand percentile (14.5 MW) rather than the 26.3 MW peak reduces required capacity by 44.9%, with residual exceedance managed through forecast-informed connection scheduling. The framework relies on publicly accessible data and is designed for transfer to other ports after retraining.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sifakis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Energy Reports