Chinese short-form dramas (duanju) drive a growing demand for automated Japanese dubbing that preserves each character’s voice. The decisive component is zero-shot cross-lingual voice cloning: synthesising Japanese speech from a short Chinese reference clip. We benchmark four neural text-to-speech systems—GPT-SoVITS v3, F5-TTS, CosyVoice2-0.5B, and the non-cloning commercial baseline EdgeTTS—on an annotated short-drama corpus (79 episodes, 3692 segments, 12 speakers) with native-speaker-verified Japanese references, combining automatic intelligibility (Whisper re-transcription) and speaker-embedding similarity with a blind listening study by five JLPT-N1 raters. Among cloning systems, only GPT-SoVITS attains usable intelligibility (character error rate 0.215, against 1.152 for F5-TTS and 4.603 for CosyVoice2), while EdgeTTS is most intelligible overall (0.030). Critically, the automatic and perceptual measures dissociate: F5-TTS scores marginally higher on embedding similarity (0.729 vs. 0.722), yet raters preferr GPT-SoVITS three to one. Naturalness shows no detectable gap between GPT-SoVITS and EdgeTTS (mean opinion score 3.08 versus 3.12, p=0.93), a null result at a resolution of about 0.6 points. In a single-speaker probe, speaker similarity rises from 0.64 to 0.71 as the reference lengthens from 3 to 10 s. Embedding similarity alone is therefore an unreliable proxy for perceived speaker identity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: