Traditional control systems often employ periodic sensing without considering whether each acquired sample provides sufficient decision value to justify its sensing cost, leading to inefficient data collection. This paper introduces a decision-theoretic active sensing framework that formulates sensing as an observe-then-plan problem guided by a value-of-information (VoI) criterion. The core of our approach is a sensing utility function that evaluates expected opportunity loss relative to the cost of acquiring a new observation. Recognizing the limitations of classical VoI under model misspecification, we derive a generalized value function that incorporates a risk premium for variability in opportunity loss across belief states and an ignorance penalty for decaying confidence in the predictive model over time. We further present a practical online heuristic algorithm that dynamically updates risk sensitivity and model confidence using posterior feedback. We validate the approach on a real-world temperature-alert case and a CO₂-aware office deployment. Across the evaluated settings, the proposed utility-aware sensing strategy substantially reduces sensing demand while retaining control-relevant decision performance under the fixed one-step downstream decision setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: