Medical students often perceive biophysics as irrelevant to clinical training. This study assessed first-year medical students’ attitudes toward biophysics using the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS), with attention to gender differences. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 198 first-year medical students (110 women, 88 men) at a Colombian university during the biophysics course in 2018. Favourability scores were calculated for eight CLASS categories and analyzed by gender using Mann–Whitney U tests with 95% confidence intervals. Overall favourability was 49.0% (95% CI: [46.8%, 51.1%]), with no significant gender difference (U = 5213.5, p = 0.351, r = −0.08, 95% CI [−0.24, 0.09]). After Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.0056), a significant gender difference was confirmed only in Personal Interest (men: 58.0%, women: 43.9%, p = 0.001). The difference in Real-World Connections (men: 64.2%, women: 54.3%, p = 0.048) did not survive correction. The lowest scores were in Applied Conceptual Understanding (34.4%) and Problem Solving Sophistication (37.1%). These 2018 baseline results indicate unfavorable attitudes toward conceptual application of biophysics, with women reporting lower personal interest; given the stability of epistemological beliefs and the absence of formal curricular reform since then, these patterns likely remain informative, though follow-up assessment is warranted. Biophysics curricula should emphasize clinical applications and employ active learning strategies to enhance engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: