We study covert power control from finite idle samples when the warden knows the true background law. Learning-aware covertness bounds the probability that learned power causes the block Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence to exceed its budget. Under matched zero-mean Gaussian sampling with unknown variance, one-sided chi-square calibration attains the target violation probability α exactly, whereas the plug-in probability approaches 1/2. A justified variance-ratio lower bound extends the guarantee to Gaussian proxy mismatch. For smooth non-Gaussian backgrounds, covert susceptibility governs the local KL expansion; a valid one-sided susceptibility bound and remainder control conditionally yield power calibration. We implement a split-cross estimator with a within-block bootstrap and empirical smoothing reserves. Independent fixed-reserve confirmation on the development mixture gave 0/100 observed violations and median power efficiency 0.944. Under matched adaptive reserves, a diagonal-corrected same-sample comparator also gave 0/100 observed violations and higher median efficiency. Two prespecified test mixtures each gave 0/100 observed violations at m=105, although the high-curvature envelope covered true susceptibility in 68/100 trials. Violations were observed in smaller-sample and light-tailed stress settings. The non-Gaussian results provide empirical evidence for the evaluated backgrounds and operating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: