RNA‐binding protein RBM4 regulates post‐transcriptional programs, but its role in shaping the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is unclear. We hypothesized that RBM4 enhances S100A10 mRNA stability to drive immune evasion. RBM4–S100A10 coupling was interrogated by expression profiling, RIP‐qPCR, actinomycin D chase, and 3′UTR reporter assays. Gain/loss models (OE‐RBM4, shS100A10) were used to assess migration/invasion and apoptosis. Immune consequences were evaluated by CD8 + T‐cell co‐culture (ELISA for Granzyme B, IFN‐γ, TNF‐α; IL‐10, TGF‐β) and immunofluorescence. Western blots probed cPLA2/5‐LOX signaling. Subcutaneous/orthotopic models measured tumor growth, CD8 + infiltration, and effector subsets; S100A10 silencing and PD‐1 blockade served as interventions. RBM4 positively correlated with S100A10 and bound the S100A10 3′UTR, increasing mRNA stability and 3′UTR‐dependent reporter activity. RBM4 overexpression promoted migration/invasion and reduced apoptosis, whereas S100A10 knockdown reversed these phenotypes. In the TIME context, RBM4 reduced CD8 + T‐cell effector function (lower Granzyme B/IFN‐γ/TNF‐α) while elevating IL‐10/TGF‐β, accompanied by diminished CD8 + infiltration and fewer CD8 + GZMB + /CD8 + TNF‐α + cells in vivo. Mechanistically, RBM4 activated the cPLA2/5‐LOX axis (increased phospho‐forms with stable totals). S100A10 silencing or PD‐1 blockade mitigated immune suppression and restrained tumor growth, indicating pathway specificity and therapeutic tractability. RBM4 enhances S100A10 mRNA stability, remodels the HCC TIME, suppresses CD8 + T‐cell effector function, and promotes immune evasion; targeting the RBM4–S100A10 axis may improve responses to PD‐1 immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: