Introduction: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has a steep learning curve, which limits widespread adoption. Objective metrics to define surgical proficiency, efficiency, and perceived workload remain underexplored outside academic institutions. This study aimed to characterize the learning curve of HoLEP from one single surgeon at an ambulatory surgical center. Methods: A total of 103 patients underwent HoLEP for BPH between March 2024 and August 2025. Surgical cases were stratified into 3 sequential groups of 34, 34, and 35 cases, respectively, based on operative chronology. Operative characteristics were compared across groups: enucleation time, laser energy, fluid use, and enucleation speed (enucleation time/specimen weight). Perceived workload was assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) to evaluate perceived workload across several “performance” domains (mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration). Comparisons of outcome metrics were made for 90-day postoperative complications. Urinary continence outcomes were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Univariable and multivariable multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations between surgical characteristics and group classification. Results: Progressive improvement was observed in operative time, enucleation time, laser energy, total fluid, enucleation speed, and NASA TLX, as seen in Table 1 . No statistically significant associations were observed between group classification and 90-day postoperative complications or urinary continence outcomes at any follow-up interval. In multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis, the NASA-TLX score (OR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.70–0.98, p = 0.02) remained an independent predictor of higher learning curve classification. ( Table 2 ). Table 1. Comparison of Baseline Characteristics among Surgical Category Groups Baseline characteristics 1st group ( N = 34) 2nd group ( N = 34) 3rd group ( N = 35) Age at surgery (yr) 71 (63.2–75.8) 70 (65.2–76.8) 70 (66.5–75) Had Urinary Retention, n (%) 12 (37.5%) 8 (24.2%) 15 (42.9%) Prior BPH Surgery, n (%)* 4 (11.8%) 2 (6.2%) 9 (34.6%) AC/AP, n (%) 14 (41.2%) 14 (45.2%) 11 (32.4%) BMI (kg/m²) 28.5 (25–31.8) 28.1 (24.8–30.6) 30.3 (27.3–32) ASA Class I/II/III, n (%) 1 (3%)/11 (33.3%)/21 (63.6%) 1 (2.9%)/17 (50%)/16 (47.1%) 0 (0%)/13 (37.1%)/22 (62.9%) HTN, n (%) 25 (73.5%) 20 (58.8%) 25 (71.4%)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rege et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: