Open-set intrusion detection must distinguish known traffic classes, reject previously unobserved attacks, and respect the available communication between a traffic monitor and a coordinator. We study X-MAG-COS, a compact evidence-message architecture that separates known-class prediction from rejection using predictive uncertainty, local anomaly evidence, and a message-prototype residual. Beyond structural properties, we derive bounds that propagate packet-scalar quantization through a normalized one-versus-rest classifier, possible predicted-class prototype changes, the composite score, and the calibrated rejection decision. The primary evaluation uses eight leave-one-attack-family-out tasks and five seeds on 5G-NIDD with training-only feature screening, packet-decoded inference, and disjoint normalization and calibration subsets. The ownership map contains two highly imbalanced metadata partitions, not eight active physical monitors. A matched extension evaluates six algorithmic replacements and four controls at identical realized false-positive counts within each task. At the all-known FPRs targeted at 0.1%,1%, and 5%, the 16-byte reference attains mean unknown recalls of 0.0934, 0.5484, and 0.7242; centralized random forest attains 0.6781, 0.7557, and 0.7942. Replacing the local forest with extra trees raises near-5% recall to 0.8062 but lowers stringent-level recall, while mean fusion has the opposite operating-point tradeoff. These substitutions do not establish a uniformly superior configuration. Fixed-model precision diagnostics satisfy the derived score and decision bounds within a stated 10−8 numerical tolerance without constituting a machine-verified proof. The 12-byte detection-only record remains a competitive alternative; the 16-byte record additionally contains an optional attribution proxy whose analyst-facing value is unmeasured. UDPFlood, the largest attack family and 37.6% of the corpus, retains below-chance mean ranking with AUROC 0.4818 ± 0.0190. Controlled peer-context experiments and separately retrained CICIoT2023 results further delimit the approach. The findings establish a characterized communication–detection tradeoff, not universal detection superiority, validated explainability, or deployment readiness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alliheedi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: