Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Temperature-vacuum swing adsorption (TVSA) direct air capture (DAC) is often modelled with a prescribed regeneration-wall temperature, which does not identify the thermal source capability required to realise it. This study replaces that boundary with a finite heat source defined by temperature, maximum thermal power, and source-to-wall conductance, with desorption pressure treated as an interacting process variable. A dynamic wall balance distinguishes source heat, wall-to-bed transfer, wall sensible heating, and source-to-wall irreversibility. For the selected APDES contactor under the fixed reference cycle, a 120 °C wall temperature limit, nominally zero external regeneration heat loss, and a desorption pressure of 0.073 bar, the conditional source-power boundary is approximately 4.2–4.3 kWmbed−3 over 120–160 °C, while the conductance boundary decreases from approximately 135 to 48 W mbed−3K−1. These limits are not jointly sufficient: at 130 °C, the minimum feasible conductance decreases from approximately 247 to 82 W mbed−3 K−1 as the power density rises from approximately 4.2 to 8.4 kWmbed−3. Near-equivalent performance requires approximately 14.23 MJ kg−1 CO2 of source heat, while thermal exergy increases from 3.62 to 4.60 MJ kg−1 CO2 between 120 and 160 °C. The resulting 187-point process envelope supports the screening of solar thermal, thermal energy storage, waste heat, and other low-carbon heat supplies for DAC integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zubairu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: