Motivation Benchmark scores can be misleading when identifier resolution, structural availability, and incomplete interaction annotation determine which glycans can be evaluated. GlycoAudit audits this evidence-to-structure path before model comparison. Results A strict accession, branch, and sequence contract retained 44 of 173 resolved SugarBind glycans (25.4%) and excluded 129 (74.6%). The joined domain was substantially more densely annotated. Under leakage-controlled held-out-positive ranking, the Web3 Unique Representation of Carbohydrate Structures (WURCS) exceeded the evaluated global structural summaries. Yet a leave-one-agent-out annotation-degree control achieved higher mean reciprocal rank (0.491 versus 0.381) and higher known-positive average precision (APknown), 0.489 versus 0.373, whereas WURCS achieved higher Recall@5 (0.688 versus 0.456). These metric-dependent reversals show that structural joinability, annotation degree, candidate construction, and evaluation choice jointly shape apparent benchmark performance. The release evaluates positive-relation ranking, not confirmed non-binding classification or cross-source transfer. Availability GlycoAudit makes evidence, joining decisions, exclusions, candidates, folds, controls, and machine-readable results inspectable in the public GlycoAudit repository.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: