Background: Sperm cryopreservation can impair sperm function through oxidative stress, membrane damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and DNA fragmentation. This study evaluated the effects of supplementing a basal freezing medium with serotonin (5-HT), L-carnitine (L-C), and coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) on post-thaw human sperm quality and explored potential molecular interactions using molecular docking. Methods: Semen samples from 63 normozoospermic volunteers were processed using the swim-up technique, and each sample was divided into five aliquots assigned to the following conditions: commercial freezing medium; basal freezing medium; basal medium supplemented with 5-HT alone; basal medium supplemented with L-C and CoQ10; and basal medium supplemented with all three compounds. Post-thaw motility, intracellular ROS, viability, and apoptosis-associated changes were assessed in all 63 donors; DNA fragmentation was assessed in a subset of 32 donors. Molecular docking explored predicted interactions of 5-HT, L-C, and coenzyme Q1 (CoQ1), a short-chain CoQ10 analogue, with selected sperm-related targets. Results: The combined formulation showed the highest median total (54%) and progressive (39%) motility, the lowest median percentage of DCF-positive spermatozoa (11.30%), and the lowest median DNA fragmentation index (2.58%). Pairwise analyses showed significant differences between the combined formulation and several comparator groups, depending on the outcome. Viability was significantly higher with the combined formulation than with basal, 5-HT-supplemented, and L-C/CoQ10-supplemented media (all Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.001). Docking predicted interactions of 5-HT with HTR4 and SLC6A4 and of CoQ1 with CPT1A. Conclusions: Combined 5-HT, L-C, and CoQ10 supplementation was associated with favorable changes in several post-thaw sperm quality parameters. These findings support further investigation of this formulation, while the predicted molecular interactions require experimental validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yılmazer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: