Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Charcoal-grill restaurants can contribute to localized air pollution through emissions of particulate matter, including PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀, particularly in small kitchens with limited ventilation. This study developed and experimentally evaluated an intelligent smoke management system integrating a dual-stage electrostatic precipitator (ESP), PID-controlled multi-pass air recirculation, and a compact smoke-capture hood for small charcoal-grill restaurants. The prototype was tested in an enclosed kitchen with a volume of 25 m 3 under Single-pass and Recirculation operating modes at airflow velocities of 2 and 3 m/s using six paired experimental runs (n = 6). System performance was evaluated based on PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀ removal efficiency, particulate removal rate, Equivalent Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADRₑq), and electrical energy consumption. The results showed that the Recirculation mode at an airflow velocity of 3 m/s achieved the highest particulate-removal efficiencies, reaching 95.15% for PM₂.₅ and 95.50% for PM₁₀. These values were significantly higher than those obtained under the corresponding Single-pass condition (p < 0.001). Under this operating condition, the measured average system-level electrical power was 68.2 W, corresponding to an energy consumption of 11.4 Wh per 10-min experimental cycle. The equivalent Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADRₑq), estimated from the experimentally derived airflow and measured particulate-removal efficiency, was approximately 813.1 m 3 /h for PM₂.₅ and 816.1 m 3 /h for PM₁₀. These findings demonstrate that integrating a dual-stage ESP with PID-controlled multi-pass air recirculation improved particulate-removal performance under the specific experimental conditions investigated. However, because the system was evaluated at a single test site using six matched experimental runs, further validation across different kitchen environments and cooking loads, together with direct ozone and VOC measurements and long-term operational assessment, is required before broader commercial applicability can be established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chumkhuntod et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: