Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Vitamin D deficiency is a major public health problem worldwide, with a particularly high incidence among university students in the Middle East and Iran. Despite adequate general knowledge, there are still significant gaps in knowledge and practice in the field of vitamin D nutrition among medical science students. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured dietary education intervention on knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) related to vitamin D in Northwestern Iran as part of a larger registry study that also assessed biochemical and academic outcomes (reported separately). Methodology A parallel, participant- and outcome assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial, with participants and outcome assessors blinded to group allocation, with pre- and post-intervention evaluation was conducted in 132 medical science students at Khoy University of Medical Sciences, West Azerbaijan, Iran, who were randomly assigned to an intervention ( n = 66) or control ( n = 66) group by stratified block randomization with allocation concealed in sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. Participants in the intervention group received four structured 60-minute sessions over four consecutive weeks that combined foundational content on vitamin D physiology and sun exposure with a primary focus on dietary sources and culinary strategies for increasing vitamin D intake. To preserve blinding, control-group participants received an equal number and duration of sessions on general health topics unrelated to vitamin D, calcium, delivered by the same facilitators in the same format. Vitamin D-related KAP was assessed at baseline and three months post-intervention using the validated D-KAP-38 questionnaire. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare post-intervention scores while controlling for baseline differences. The four subscales were co-primary outcomes; a Bonferroni-adjusted sensitivity analysis (alpha = 0.0125) was added. Results At baseline, participants demonstrated relatively high general knowledge (86.16 ± 15.16%) but substantially lower nutritional knowledge (58.86 ± 22.26%) and practice scores (52.10 ± 7.89%). Following the intervention, the intervention group showed statistically significant within-group improvements in all four D-KAP-38 subscales (mean chang: general knowledge 9.02%, nutritional knowledge 17.88%, attitude 7.39%, and self-reported practice 7.84%; all p < 0.001). whereas the control group improved less ( general knowledge 7.99%, attitude 4.73%, self-reported practice 3.11%) and showed no change in nutritional knowledge (1.52%, p = 0.716). ANCOVA confirmed significant between-group differences for all subscales after adjustment for baseline scores ( adjusted mean difference, 95% CI: general knowledge 8.30, 5.79–10.80; nutritional knowledge 20.62, 14.82–26.43; attitude 9.66, 6.53–12.79; self-reported practice 7.80, 5.19–10.40; all p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.214–0.277). All four effects remained significant after Bonferroni adjustment (adjusted p < 0.001). Conclusion A four-session, diet-focused educational intervention significantly improved self-reported vitamin D-related knowledge, attitudes, and practice among medical science students in Northwestern Iran, with the greatest gain in nutritional knowledge—historically the weakest component of vitamin D literacy. Because outcomes reported here are knowledge- and self-report-based, they should be interpreted as evidence of improved KAP. Whether these increases are consistent with improved biochemical vitamin D status will be investigated in the companion report of the same trial. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because of retrospective trial registration, exclusive reliance on self-reported outcomes, the absence of multiplicity adjustment in the primary analysis ( a Bonferroni sensitivity analysis is reported), and a near-celing general-knowledge score. Trial registration Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20260612069757N1), registered retroactively on August 6, 2026.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karimi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: