Single-date UAV vegetation indices are widely used to assess potato crop performance and estimate yield. However, whether their biological interpretation remains consistent across cultivars and growth stages is rarely examined. This study investigated how the relationships between UAV-derived multispectral and thermal canopy indicators and potato yield changed during crop development under contrasting irrigation in two cultivars with contrasting maturity classes (Anouk and Celandine). UAV surveys were conducted in July and August, and canopy metrics were related to final yield and tuber traits. The relationship between NDVI and yield differed markedly between cultivars and growth stages. In the early-maturing cultivar Anouk, July NDVI showed a strong positive correlation with yield ( r = 0.87, p = 0.002), whereas August NDVI was not informative. In the late-maturing cultivar Celandine, the relationship reversed from a positive correlation in July ( r = 0.56) to a strong negative correlation in August ( r = −0.80, p = 0.009), indicating that greater late-season canopy greenness was associated with lower yield. Exploratory LOOCV Random Forest models achieved the highest yield prediction accuracy using July features for Anouk ( R 2 = 0.72) and August features for Celandine ( R 2 = 0.47), while multi-temporal features provided similar predictive performance. Greater temporal declines in NDVI were associated with higher yield in both cultivars, consistent with the change in canopy greenness acting as a phenological indicator of the transition from vegetative growth to tuber bulking. These results demonstrate that the interpretation of UAV-derived vegetation indices is strongly dependent on cultivar maturity and growth stage. A single UAV acquisition may therefore provide misleading assessments of crop performance when canopy phenology is not considered. Rather than serving as fixed proxies for yield, canopy vegetation indices should be interpreted within cultivar-specific and temporal contexts when used for potato monitoring and agronomic decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: