Background Type 2 (T2)-low asthma is a heterogeneous endotype associated with neutrophilic or paucigranulocytic airway inflammation, reduced corticosteroid responsiveness, and poorer clinical outcomes. Selected T2-low-associated asthma phenotypes—particularly late-onset disease, obesity-associated asthma, and menopause-associated asthma—are more frequently observed in women, suggesting that sex-specific biological and environmental factors influence disease expression. This review synthesizes the current evidence on the determinants of T2-low asthma in women, with a focus on epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, and therapeutic implications. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for English-language articles published up to July 2026. Search terms included keywords related to T2-low asthma, sex differences, reproductive factors, obesity, and smoking. Results The reported prevalence of T2-low asthma varies from 14% to 50% with neutrophilic asthma accounting for 20% to 30% of patients. In women, estrogen signaling and hormonal variability across the menstrual cycle and menopause may contribute to T helper 17 (Th17)-skewed neutrophilic inflammation, while obesity and smoking may exacerbate disease severity and reduce corticosteroid sensitivity. Management includes weight reduction, smoking cessation, comorbidity optimization, and selected add-on therapies, including macrolides, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), tezepelumab, and novel therapies such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in obesity-associated asthma. Conclusions The absence of validated positive biomarkers remains a critical barrier to accurate diagnosis, patient stratification, and targeted therapy development. Important limitations include heterogeneous study populations and predominantly observational data. Improved understanding of sex-specific influences on T2-low asthma may enhance recognition and guide personalized therapeutic strategies, reducing disease burden in this underserved population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: