Key result
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance metrics and 26-57 protein signatures (r=0.43-0.72) predicted 41 outcomes, with left ventricular mass strongly linked to heart failure (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.88-2.20).
Why the study?
The upstream proteomic determinants of cardiovascular remodeling and their contributions to systemic diseases and mortality risk remain incompletely understood.
Do circulating plasma proteomic signatures predict cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) remodeling phenotypes and mediate the risk of incident cardiovascular and systemic diseases and mortality in community-dwelling adults?
Cohort (n=68,566)
Mendelian randomization
Yes
Do circulating plasma proteomic signatures predict cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) remodeling phenotypes and mediate the risk of incident cardiovascular and systemic diseases and mortality in community-dwelling adults?
This study establishes circulating proteomic signatures of CMR-defined cardiac remodeling that predict cardiovascular and systemic morbidity and mortality, while identifying genetically supported causal proteins (such as ISLR2, EPHA4, and NRCAM) and structural mediation pathways (such as left ventricular mass mediating atrial fibrillation) as potential therapeutic targets.
CMR-protein signatures should not yet guide clinical decisions; hypothesis-generating for causal remodeling pathways and outcome prediction.
The upstream proteomic determinants of cardiovascular remodeling and their contributions to systemic diseases and mortality risk remain incompletely understood. Here, using longitudinal data from the UK Biobank ( N = 68,566; median follow-up 3.82–3.98 years), we systematically evaluated the associations between 14 cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) metrics and the risks of 41 cardiovascular and systemic diseases, as well as all-cause and cause-specific mortality. We identified 88 significant cross-system associations, supporting the disease relevance of CMR-assessed cardiovascular structural and functional phenotypes. Among a proteomic sub-cohort ( N = 7,892), multivariable-adjusted regression identified 681 unique proteins significantly associated with CMR phenotypes, revealing a biological landscape dominated by immune-inflammatory processes and extracellular matrix remodeling. Utilizing machine learning approaches, we distilled CMR-associated plasma proteins into parsimonious protein-CMR model comprising 26–57 proteins. These models demonstrated moderate to strong predictive performance for CMR metrics (Pearson r : 0.43–0.72) and showed potential utility for predicting and stratifying the risk of incident cardiovascular and other systemic morbidities and mortality. Genetically, Mendelian randomization (MR) prioritized 222 potential causal protein-CMR pairs with effect directions consistent with observational analyses, and highlighted proteins with associations across multiple CMR phenotypes, including ISLR2, EPHA4, and NRCAM. Colocalization analysis further prioritized 6 pairs with moderate-to-strong evidence of shared causal variants. Subsequent two-step MR suggested that left ventricular mass potentially mediates the genetically supported associations of five upstream proteins with atrial fibrillation. Finally, we integrated single-cell transcriptomic annotations and druggability assessment to explore the potential translational relevance of prioritized proteins. Together, these findings characterize circulating proteomic signatures associated with CMR-defined cardiovascular remodeling and provide an integrated framework for understanding their biological and prognostic relevance to cardiovascular and systemic disease risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular and systemic diseases (n=68,566). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) remodeling phenotypes (e.g., left ventricular myocardial mass) and circulating plasma proteomic signatures vs. Reference CMR metric levels or lower proteomic risk score tertiles was evaluated on Incident heart failure (strongest cardiovascular association among 41 systemic outcomes evaluated with 14 CMR metrics, specifically for left ventricular myocardial mass [LVM]) (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.88-2.20, p=<0.0012). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance metrics and 26-57 protein signatures (r=0.43-0.72) predicted 41 outcomes, with left ventricular mass strongly linked to heart failure (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.88-2.20).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: