Key result
Pulsed field ablation selectively targets myocardium while preserving extracellular matrix and adjacent non-cardiac structures.
Why the study?
Pulsed field ablation has rapidly reshaped contemporary electrophysiology practice, requiring a comprehensive mechanistic analysis of its specific effects on myocardial tissue, neural structures, and the cardiac conduction system.
This review clarifies that pulsed field ablation acts via preferential myocardial ablation rather than absolute tissue selectivity, driven by biophysical properties, calcium-mediated cellular susceptibility, and the lack of myocardial regenerative capacity compared to collateral structures like nerves and the oesophagus.
Aims Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel ablation modality for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and has rapidly reshaped contemporary electrophysiology practice. This article provides a comprehensive analysis on the mechanisms underlying the specific effects of PFA on myocardial, neural tissue structures, and the cardiac conduction system, integrating biophysical principles with preclinical and clinical evidence relevant to contemporary electrophysiology practice. Methods and results This document provides an exhaustive mechanistic explanation for the preferential effects of PFA on myocardium and the limits of the ‘tissue-selectivity’ concept. The complex interplay between cellular and tissue-level biophysics, biological responses, and tissue regenerative capacity that determines differential susceptibility to electroporation across tissues is analysed. Distinct patterns of lesion formation and maturation following PFA are also reviewed, highlighting the temporal and histopathological differences compared with radiofrequency ablation. Additionally, lesion formation in heterogeneous substrates is analysed, including fibrotic and adipose-rich myocardium, where local electric field distribution critically influences lesion durability. Conclusion The article further examines the interaction between pulsed electric fields and neural tissue, with emphasis on the phrenic nerve and intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system. While nerve stimulation and transient reversible conduction disturbances produced by reversible electroporation can occur during ablation, permanent neural injury appears extremely rare in current clinical experience. Finally, this manuscript examines current understanding regarding the specific effects of PFA on the cardiac conduction system, which according to the limited available evidence appear strongly dependent on electric field dose and anatomical proximity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duchâteau et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiac arrhythmias. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) vs. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and other thermal ablation modalities was evaluated. Pulsed field ablation preferentially ablates myocardial tissue while preserving extracellular matrix and allowing non-cardiac tissues like nerves and the oesophagus to regenerate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: