Initial Clip Selection and Outcomes After Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: A Single-Center Experience

Background: Whether the initial clip type selected during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the mitral valve—grasping width and arm length—independently influences procedural and echocardiographic outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 138 consecutive patients undergoing mitral TEER. The first implanted clip was classified as narrow standard-length (NT), long narrow-arm (XT), or long wide-arm (XTW). Determinants of initial clip selection and its association with procedural success (residual mitral regurgitation [MR] ≤ 1+), post-procedural transmitral gradient, and the need for ≥2 clips were assessed using multivariable logistic and linear regression. Results: Median age was 74.0 (66.0–80.0), 74.5 (66.0–82.5), and 75.0 (70.0–79.0) years, and median LVEF was 35.0% (30.0–50.0), 30.0% (25.0–45.0), and 40.0% (25.0–45.0), for the NT, XT, and XTW groups, respectively; 66% of patients overall were male. An XTW clip was implanted first in 61.6% of patients. XTW selection was independently associated with larger effective regurgitant orifice area, lower LVEF, longer posterior leaflet length, and secondary MR (all p < 0.05), whereas NT selection favored younger age, smaller orifice, and higher LVEF. After adjustment for these factors, no statistically significant independent association was detected between initial clip type and residual MR ≥2+, post-procedural transmitral gradient, or the need for additional clips (all p > 0.05); however, confidence intervals were wide. On univariable analysis, larger left atrial size and moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation were associated with residual MR ≥ 2+, but neither remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: Initial clip selection was associated with valve anatomy, LVEF and MR etiology. No statistically significant independent association between initial clip type and procedural or short-term echocardiographic outcomes was detected in this cohort. Given the observational design, confounding by indication, limited sample size and wide confidence intervals, clinically relevant effects cannot be excluded, and these findings do not establish the superiority or equivalence of any clip-selection strategy.