Key result
PULSESELECT linked to significantly higher cough reflex rates vs. FARAPULSE and VARIPULSE during PFA.
Why the study?
Does the choice of pulsed field ablation system (FARAPULSE, PULSESELECT, or VARIPULSE) affect intraprocedural vagal responses and cough reflexes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation under deep sedation?
Observational (n=200)
No
Does the choice of pulsed field ablation system (FARAPULSE, PULSESELECT, or VARIPULSE) affect intraprocedural vagal responses and cough reflexes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation under deep sedation?
During atrial fibrillation ablation under deep sedation, the PULSESELECT system is associated with a significantly higher rate of intraprocedural cough reflex compared to FARAPULSE and VARIPULSE, whereas vagal response rates are similar across all three platforms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cough reflex rates vary by PFA system; leaves open effects on procedural safety and device selection.
Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is increasingly used for atrial fibrillation (AF), but device‐specific autonomic and respiratory reflex responses remain insufficiently characterized. We aimed to compare vagal responses and cough reflexes among three commercially available PFA systems across individual pulmonary veins and the posterior wall. Methods This retrospective single‐center study included 200 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation with FARAPULSE ( n = 83), PULSESELECT ( n = 83), or VARIPULSE ( n = 34). Vagal response was operationally defined as bradyarrhythmia requiring temporary back‐up pacing during energy delivery. Cough reflex was assessed intraprocedurally at the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV), left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV), right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV), right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV), and posterior wall. Results Baseline characteristics were generally similar among groups, although heart failure and diabetes mellitus (DM) differed significantly. Overall vagal response rates did not differ among FARAPULSE, PULSESELECT, and VARIPULSE (61.4%, 67.5%, and 58.8%, respectively; p = 0.596). In contrast, overall cough reflex rates differed significantly (75.9%, 91.6%, and 55.9%; p < 0.001), driven by consistently higher rates with PULSESELECT. On logistic regression, male sex, body mass index, and use of PULSESELECT versus FARAPULSE were independently associated with cough reflex. Conclusions Cough reflex was most frequent with PULSESELECT, whereas no significant difference in vagal response was observed among platforms. Recognizing these differences may improve procedural planning, sedation strategy, and prophylactic management during PFA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=200). PULSESELECT pulsed field ablation system vs. FARAPULSE and VARIPULSE pulsed field ablation systems was evaluated on Intraprocedural cough reflex and vagal response (bradyarrhythmia requiring temporary back-up pacing) (p=< 0.001). PULSESELECT had higher cough reflex rates than FARAPULSE and VARIPULSE (91.6% vs 75.9% vs 55.9%; p<0.001), while vagal response did not differ significantly (67.5% vs 61.4% vs 58.8%; p=0.596).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: