Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In-process measurement of coating and liquid film thickness on conductive and non-conductive substrates is essential for quality assurance in industries such as automotive painting, pharmaceutical coating, and consumer product finishing. However, existing inspection methods face significant challenges: first, vision-based and statistical approaches are highly sensitive to environmental conditions and material reflectivity, resulting in unstable measurements. Second, current capacitive or contact-based techniques require static setups or pre-calibrated dielectric properties, limiting adaptability during dynamic spreading. Third, inadequate spatial resolution prevents early detection of localised defects. These limitations often lead to undetected non-uniformities such as thin spreading, centred spreading, or empty spreading, causing material waste, costly rework, and product assessment failures. To address these issues, this paper proposes a robot-assisted capacitive sensing framework for non-destructive, in-process thickness estimation on mimic substrates. A 6-DoF collaborative robot (UR10e) executes structured multi-point scanning, while a capacitive sensor captures dielectric responses correlated with micrometre-scale layer thickness. A calibrated linear regression model maps sensor signals to thickness values, enabling detection of thin films, pooling, and voids in-process. Experimental validation across four target thickness levels (15–90 µm) under uncontrolled conditions achieved an R² of 0.915 and a mean squared error of 0.00699. The proposed system provides a Cobot-assisted, interpretable, automated sensing solution suitable for in-process quality control of liquid films in industrial spreading, painting, and coating applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Othman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: