Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between physical preparation, training sessions (TS) and friendly matches’ (FM) demands, and playing status during European Championship (EC). Method: Twelve under-16 (U-16) basketball players performed physical (jumping, agility, aerobic fitness, and lower limb asymmetry index [ASI]) tests prior to attending the national team training camp. External training load was assessed using the WIMU PRO System put in place during TS (n = 19) and FM (n = 3), integrating the national team preparation. Perceptual response (RPE), muscle soreness (DOMS), and game-related statistics were also collected. Playing status during the U-16 EC (starters vs nonstarters) were taken into consideration to analyze the between-subjects differences across all variables. A stepwise discriminant analysis was computed to identify the construct that best differentiated the players’ playing status (starters vs nonstarters) during the EC. Results: The starters were characterized by lower movement demands in both TS (ES: −0.02 to −1.26) and FM (ES: −0.03 to −1.94), however, outscored nonstarters in most FM-related statistics (ES: 0.10 to 3.62), with exception to blocks and rebounds. The number of high-intensity decelerations during FM (p ≤ .05), but also training DOMS, number of steals, efficiency, minutes during FM, and countermovement jump (CMJ) (p ≤ .01) substantially discriminated the playing status over the course of the EC. Conclusion: Game-related statistics obtained in FM seem to be a determinant aspect that increases the probability to be the starter during the EC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arede et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: