This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This Special Issue argues that fragmentation is a structuring condition of contemporary conflict, operating within domestic conflict systems and across the international order. Domestically, authority is dispersed among elites, armed groups, and civic actors; internationally, peacebuilding frameworks have given way to parallel mediation, regionalised intervention, and competing geopolitical projects. These forms are mutually reinforcing. What appears as disorder is a patterned architecture of authority through which peace processes reconfigure rather than consolidate power. The articles show that contemporary peace architectures manage fragmentation rather than resolve it, producing a post-liberal peace that blurs the boundaries among settlement, stabilisation, and predatory governance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: