Opium use remains a major public health concern in Iran and is associated with serious health and social consequences. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a Social Cognitive Theory-based virtual empowerment intervention on opium-use preventive behaviors. This quasi-experimental study recruited 94 young men aged 18–29 years from comprehensive health service centers in northeastern Iran. Eight health service centers were non-randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups before participant recruitment; participants were not individually randomized. The intervention consisted of four Social Cognitive Theory–based WhatsApp sessions delivered over two weeks. Data were collected at baseline and three months post-intervention using a validated researcher-developed questionnaire assessing opium-use preventive behaviors and theoretical constructs. Complete-case analyses were performed using non-parametric tests and a linear mixed-effects model accounting for clustering within health centers in SPSS. Preventive behavior scores were similar between groups after the intervention, and the adjusted linear mixed-effects model showed no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups (β = 0.67, 95% CI − 1.83 to 3.17; p = 0.537). Post-intervention between-group differences were not observed for SCT constructs. Within-group analysis in the intervention group showed improvements in knowledge, outcome expectations and experiences, situational perception, environment, self-control, and emotional coping, whereas self-efficacy, barrier self-efficacy, and preventive behavior did not change significantly. Although the brief, fully virtual theory-informed program was associated with improvements in some SCT constructs within the intervention group, it did not result in a statistically significant improvement in preventive behaviors. Future interventions should prioritize feedback-rich skills rehearsal and incorporate mechanisms that address social and contextual influences to improve behavioral impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joveini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from BMC Psychology