Brain-based predictive models offer a promising approach to understanding individual differences in cognitive functioning across the lifespan. This review synthesizes current literature on brain-based cognitive predictions using large-scale datasets, examining how methodological choices and data-related factors impact model performance. We find that brain-based predictive models demonstrate relatively consistent, albeit wide ranging performance across the lifespan, explaining approximately 10-40% of variance in cognitive abilities. Key findings include: (1) models perform better when predicting general cognitive ability compared to specific functions; (2) crystallized abilities are more predictable than fluid abilities; (3) task-based functional connectivity generally outperforms resting-state approaches in younger populations, while structural measures become superior predictors in older adults; (4) multimodal approaches using hierarchical stacked models optimize prediction accuracy; and (5) elastic net and ridge regression provide optimal balance between predictive performance and computational efficiency. In summary, we propose methodological advances to improve the precision and utility of brain-based cognitive predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christensen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: