This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) for biomethane production generates nutrient-rich-digestate, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and carbon-rich off-gases from thermochemical conversion of solid digestate. Their integrated bioconversion could valorise AD-derived nutrients and carbon while producing biomass with potential feed applications. However, residual microbial contaminants limit the direct use of AD by-products for protein production, a challenge potentially overcome by combining thermophilic cultivation, digestate pretreatment and gaseous substrates. This study evaluated microbial protein production using the thermophile Hydrogenibacillus schlegelii , the mesophile Cupriavidus necator and an anaerobic consortium. Pre-treated agricultural liquid-digestate supplied nutrients, while two synthetic-gas mixtures provided carbon and energy: (i) green hydrogen (H 2 ) combined with CO 2 from AD-biogas upgrading, and (ii) syngas representing solid digestate gasification, containing H 2 /CO 2 , and carbon monoxide (CO). Initial screening in synthetic media compared growth kinetics and biomass protein contents under H 2 /CO 2 and syngas conditions, identifying the two pure cultures as the most suitable candidates for digestate-based cultivation. During subsequent semi-continuous cultivation with pre-treated digestate, both strains maintained stable growth, with maximum protein contents of 75 ± 3% w /w for C. necator grown on H 2 /CO 2 ; and 72 ± 6% for H. schlegelii grown on syngas, with amino acid profiles comparable to soybean meal and fishmeal. Digestate pre-treatment reduced solids and microbial load, while Hydrogenibacillus and Cupriavidus accounted for 100% and 94% of bacterial reads in thermophilic and mesophilic cultures. This work demonstrates that new AD-upcycling routes based on thermophilic syngas fermentation could enable the conversion of AD-derived nutrients and gases into microbial protein for feed applications, promoting AD plant circularity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benedetto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: