ArXiv Listing Falsely Claims P vs NP and Navier-Stokes Solutions — E8 Intelligence Research

FINDING: The arXiv listing claims solutions to Clay Millennium Problems #3 (P vs NP) and #4 (Navier-Stokes regularity), but the remaining entries are unrelated AI/ML competition papers and a Wikipedia article on the Uruk period — no substantive mathematical content is extractable from the provided abstracts. | MATH: No equations, constants, or ratios are present in the supplied text. The only numeric references are dates (2025, 2026, 4th millennium BC) and arXiv identifiers. | CONNECTION: None — no geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618), no base-60, no crystallographic or lattice structures appear in any finding. The Uruk period reference is archaeological, not mathematical. | DEPTH: 1/10 — The claim of solving P vs NP and Navier-Stokes is unverifiable from the abstract alone; the other papers are applied engineering (agent systems, clinical QA, REST API testing, video engagement) with zero mathematical novelty exposed. The Uruk entry is irrelevant to the research domain. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com