Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transcutaneous bilirubinometry is the standard non-invasive screen for neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia, yet probe-to-probe wavelength drift silently displaces the spectral basis of every risk estimate built on it. the present analysis treats that displacement as a calibration-transfer problem and evaluates, by formal analysis rather than by field measurement, how much phototherapy-referral equity an artificial-intelligence risk model can lose before its decisions become unreliable. A linear measurement-error model is developed in which the indicated bilirubin is the true value plus a probe-specific spectral bias, and the bias is propagated through a fixed-threshold referral rule to give closed-form expressions for referral-probability distortion and for the equity gap between two probes of differing drift. The analysis is a design study: no observational data are used or claimed, and the operating characteristics are characterised under a declared variance structure with between-cluster SD 6.0, residual SD 4.5 and intraclass correlation 0.64. Under that structure, 52 clusters are required for 80% power to detect a 5-percentage-point effect in a before-after-control-impact design, and power was estimated across 2000 replications per design cell for cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effects of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. The contribution is a transfer-aware referral rule and an explicit equity criterion that a calibration programme must meet before an AI jaundice model can be deployed across probes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ssemakula et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: