This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Quantitative assessment of pneumococcal vaccine–induced immunity is essential for monitoring vaccine effectiveness. The World Health Organization (WHO) pneumococcal polysaccharide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Pn PS ELISA) remains the reference standard for measuring serotype-specific IgG concentrations; however, it is limited by its low throughput and high resource requirements. Our study aim is to develop and analytically characterize a 24-plex microsphere-based immunoassay for simultaneous quantitation of serotype-specific IgG antibodies against 24 pneumococcal vaccine serotypes. Methods Pneumococcal polysaccharides were conjugated to magnetic microspheres using the DMTMM (4-(4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholinium chloride) coupling method, and assay performance was evaluated using the WHO reference serum (007sp). Results The 24-plex assay demonstrated assay working ranges with lower limits of quantitation between 0.4 and 6.7 ng/mL and upper limits up to 38,699 ng/mL. Homologous inhibition exceeded 80% across all serotypes, while heterologous inhibition remained below 20% except for structurally related serogroups (6A/6B, 9N/9V, 19A/19F). Intra- and inter-assay precision met the predefined acceptance criterion of coefficients of variation below 20% for all serotypes, and accuracy ranged between 87% and 118%. Concentration-based comparison with the WHO Pn PS ELISA using Deming regression showed slopes close to unity for most serotypes, indicating quantitative consistency between the two assays within the evaluated reference-serum dilution series. Conclusion Our multiplex assay covers 24 pneumococcal vaccine serotypes supporting its analytical performance and comparability with WHO Pn PS ELISA. Our 24-plex assay provides a high-throughput and efficient method for pneumococcal serotype-specific IgG quantification, while further clinical and inter-laboratory evaluation is warranted.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: