Task-shifting oral health education from dental therapists to lay community health workers is widely proposed to extend caries prevention in resource-constrained school systems, yet the non-inferiority of this substitution for untreated caries outcomes has not been established with a design capable of bounding coverage loss. The analysis was structured as a replication-based evaluation of an ordinary least squares estimator applied to 600 data sets of N = 500 drawn from a declared data-generating process with intercept 12.0, exposure 0.42, group -3.1, severity 1.35 and error SD 4.2, using seed 1706445746. The estimator recovered the exposure coefficient with negligible bias (-0.00122) and a root mean squared error of 0.01553, while the intercept showed bias of 0.06239 and a root mean squared error of 0.89348; empirical coverage of the nominal 95% confidence intervals was 1.0 for both the intercept and the exposure coefficient. The results indicate that the estimator is well calibrated for the exposure contrast under the stated process, and they define the precision that a non-inferiority margin for dental therapy coverage would require. Task-shifting evaluations should be designed around estimator behaviour and coverage bounds rather than around conventional significance testing alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uwase et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: