Summary All-age autism and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder pathway reform in England is often framed around waiting lists and capacity. However, backlog data alone cannot show how people move through referral, triage, assessment, support and follow-up, or where inequities and unmet need are hidden. Current data also struggle to distinguish confirmed diagnosis, suspected diagnosis, disclosure, self-identification and co-occurring needs. This creates pathway blindness: systems can see pressure, but not flow, fairness or diagnostic visibility. We argue that reform should begin with structured system mapping, agreed definitions and a realistic minimum data-set before dashboards or predictive analytics are used to guide service change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafiei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: