Community clinic oxygen concentrator fleets fail through compressor degradation whose telemetry is sparse, delayed and heterogeneous across devices, so maintenance schedules optimised against a single empirical failure distribution can leave clinics without oxygen when the realised distribution shifts. the present analysis formulates fleet maintenance scheduling as a distributionally robust optimisation problem over an ambiguity set of compressor failure distributions calibrated to telemetry uncertainty, and evaluates the resulting schedules in a computed healthcare continuity study. The design is a before-after-control-impact evaluation with a declared variance structure (between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5, intraclass correlation = 0.64), power estimated across 2000 replications per design cell for cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. The analysis is methodological: no observational fleet data are used or claimed, and the reported quantities characterise the operating characteristics of the design rather than the performance of a deployed schedule. Under the declared variance structure, 56 clusters are required for 80% power at a 5 percentage point effect. The contribution is a formal bridge between distributionally robust scheduling and the cluster-level evaluation logic that healthcare continuity studies require, together with an explicit statement of the design conditions under which that bridge holds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakotoarisoa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: