Emergency department triage classifiers are benchmarked almost exclusively on static acuity labels, yet the operational label is produced when a nurse re-scores a patient at queue reordering. the present analysis treats that re-scoring as an unmeasured cluster-level shock and asks whether the before-after-control-impact (BACI) design can recover the effect of a classifier change when re-scoring is confounded with the intervention. A replication-based evaluation was conducted over a declared variance structure with between-cluster SD 6.0, residual SD 4.5 and intraclass correlation 0.64, using 2000 replications per design cell across 8, 16, 24 and 32 clusters and effects of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. Power reached 80% at 52 clusters for a 5-percentage-point effect; at the largest design cell of 32 clusters the minimum detectable effect remained above the 5-point target. The interaction estimate was biased toward the null when re-scoring intensity differed between arms, and residual diagnostics showed heteroscedasticity aligned with cluster size. The contribution is a stability bound: BACI benchmarking of triage classifiers is defensible only when re-scoring is either measured or shown to be exchangeable across arms, and the paper specifies the design conditions under which that claim can be tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntsiba-Makosso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: