Balancing rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) under reduced nitrogen (N) input remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate effects of fertilizer type and N rate on canopy function, yield formation, and NUE; examine source–sink relationships; and identify strategies balancing yield and NUE. A two-year field experiment (2024–2025) compared chicken manure (CM), pig manure (PM), and rapeseed cake fertilizer (RCF) at four N rates (135, 180, 225, and 270 kg N ha−1), with conventional chemical fertilization at 270 kg N ha−1 as the control. Across both years, RCF increased grain yield by 8–9% at 135 and 180 kg N ha−1 versus CM and PM, while maintaining higher leaf area index, SPAD, and canopy source capacity from heading to mid-grain filling. Grain yield was strongly and positively correlated with population spikelet number (r = 0.881, p < 0.001). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM; 2025) indicated that RCF positively affected canopy source capacity (1.807 ***), which in turn positively influenced nitrogen accumulation and translocation (0.441 ***), strengthening source–sink coordination (0.512 ***). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP; 2025) showed superior integrated performance of RCF treatments for yield and NUE. These results suggest that C2 (RCF supplied at 180 kg N ha−1) may help improve rice yield and NUE in the Huaibei region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: