The impact of frailty reversal on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is unclear, and the biological mechanisms involved are poorly understood. A longitudinal cohort study was conducted using data from 468,801 UK Biobank participants. An elastic net regression was used to identify the proteomic signature associated with frailty. A proteome-wide association study identified proteins shared by frailty and CVD. Mediation analyses were adopted to evaluate whether the proteomic signature and hub proteins mediated the frailty-CVD relationship. Frailty reversal was associated with a significantly reduced risk of CVD. A total of 309 proteins were identified as being associated with physical frailty. The constructed proteomic signature was positively associated with CVD risk (HR per SD increase: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.56–1.64). Mediation analyses revealed that the proteomic signature of physical frailty [natural indirect effect: 1.14 (1.12–1.15), proportion mediated: 49.18% (42.73%–53.40%)] and identified hub proteins (e.g., TNF, IL-1β, IL6) partially mediated the relationship between physical frailty and CVD. Reversing physical frailty is associated with improved cardiac morphology and a lower risk of CVD. These findings support the cardiovascular benefits of frailty reversal and suggest a potential mediating role of proteomic pathways in this association.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: