Accurate projections of irrigation water requirement are central to food security and water allocation planning in Asia’s rice systems. Most large-scale assessments of irrigation water use rely on the conventional FAO-56 reference-crop framework, which accounts for atmospheric water demand but typically treats vegetation-related coefficients as constants, thereby omitting potential changes under rising atmospheric CO 2 . Here we quantify how vegetation responses to rising CO 2 reshape rice irrigation water requirements using a process-based analytical approach that explicitly represents CO 2 -driven vegetation effects. We estimate changes of irrigation water requirements across major Asian rice-growing regions from 1982 to 2020–2020–2100 under SSP5–8.5, using both this dynamic-vegetation estimate ( I VEG ) and the conventional FAO-56 approach ( I RC ). While I RC and I VEG show broadly similar spatiotemporal variability during 1982–2020, they show diverging trajectories under rising CO 2 . Over 2020–2100, I RC increases by 6.7 mm yr⁻¹ per decade, whereas I VEG decreases by 3.6 mm yr⁻¹ per decade, yielding an end-of-century gap of ~155 mm yr⁻¹ . Attribution analyses show that I VEG additionally captures eco-physiological feedbacks that partially offset the climate-driven increase of irrigation demand as projected for I RC . Through factorial experiments, we further decompose vegetation effects into two opposing components: a CO 2 -driven physiological water-saving effect (−2.55 mm yr⁻¹ yr⁻¹) and an LAI-driven structural water-consuming effect (1.28 mm yr⁻¹ yr⁻¹), with stronger modeled net reductions associated with higher rice harvested-area density. These results highlight that vegetation representation is an important source of structural uncertainty in future rice irrigation-demand projections, and that neglecting CO 2 -driven vegetation responses may lead to higher projected net irrigation requirements under high-CO 2 conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: