Attention-based sepsis alerting models are increasingly proposed for low-connectivity hospital wards, where charting is sparse and intermittent. Their interpretability is often assumed to be a property of the model alone, yet sparse charting may systematically distort the attention weights on which clinical trust depends. the present analysis characterises the interpretability limits of attention-based sepsis alerting under sparse charting by formalising attention as a function of observed charting density and deriving a bound on attention-weight distortion. The analysis is a computer robustness evaluation: no observational data are used or claimed. A before-after-control-impact design is specified with a declared variance structure (between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5, intraclass correlation = 0.64), and power is estimated across 2000 design cells for cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. The design requires 54 clusters for 5 percentage points at 80% power. The results show that attention weights are not stable identifiers of clinical evidence when charting density falls below a threshold that depends on the intraclass correlation. Interpretability claims for attention-based sepsis alerting in low-connectivity wards therefore require charting-density reporting alongside model performance, and the paper specifies the conditions under which such claims are defensible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barry et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: