Background: Cervical cancer screening remains underutilized in many low-resource settings. This study assessed screening uptake and factors influencing utilization among women aged 25–49 years receiving health services at Moroto Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), Uganda. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2026 among 70 women recruited from the outpatient and gynaecology departments using simple random sampling. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire and analysed descriptively using SPSS, Microsoft Excel, and a scientific calculator. Results: Of 70 participants, 28 (40.0%) were aged 25–30 years, 49 (70.0%) were married, 42 (60.0%) had secondary education, and all resided in Moroto. Eleven women (15.7%) had ever undergone cervical cancer screening, while 59 (84.3%) had never screened. Among unscreened women, 47 (80%) strongly agreed that screening was painful, 34 (58%) did not know where to screen, 32 (54%) believed screening reagents cause cancer, and 31 (52%) believed the uterus is removed during screening. Overall, 56 (80%) had heard of cervical cancer, but 41 (59%) were unaware that screening was available at MRRH. The report also indicated inadequate sensitization and limited health-worker recommendation as health-system concerns. Conclusion: Cervical cancer screening uptake was low in this hospital-based sample. Misconceptions, limited awareness of service availability, and health-system communication gaps were prominent descriptive findings. Recommendation: MRRH health workers should provide routine screening education and recommendations during patient encounters; hospital management should visibly communicate where and when screening is available; and the Ministry of Health with implementing partners should strengthen community sensitization and screening outreaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Echengu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: