Ghana's 2018 excise levy on sugar-sweetened beverages was introduced with oral-health revenue earmarking, yet whether the levy shifted adolescent dental-hygiene care from curative therapy visits toward preventive hygiene attendance remains unestimated. the present analysis specifies a counterfactual framework in which the levy operates through two channels: a price-induced reduction in sugar-sweetened-beverage consumption that lowers caries incidence, and a revenue-induced expansion of community dental-hygiene capacity that lowers the time cost of preventive attendance. Using the DHS Program indicator 'Adolescents 10-19' (HC_AGEG_P_ADL) for 36 African countries over 1990-2025 (576 country-survey observations; mean 23.731, SD 1.777, range 21.28 in South Africa to 27.63 in Eswatini), the paper demonstrates that the indicator's cross-country variance is too compressed to serve as an outcome in a Ghana-only interrupted time-series design, and that the design must therefore be specified as a comparative computed-control estimation with Ghana as the treated unit and the 35-country pool as the donor pool. The paper derives the identifying assumptions, the substitution-versus-prevention decomposition, and the minimum detectable effect that the design can credibly recover. It argues that therapy-visit substitution is the wrong primary estimand: the levy's dental-hygiene consequence is a composition shift within a roughly fixed visit volume, and the estimand should be the ratio of preventive to curative visits rather than total visit counts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tchivinda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: